BAMF Classic Film Reviews – GONE ARE THE DAYS

GONE ARE THE DAYS 1963 (a.k.a. The Man from C.O.T.T.O.N.; Purlie Victorious; Honeychile, It’s The Man from C.O.T.T.O.N ) director: Nicolas Webster; starring: Ossie Davis, Ruby Dee, Sorrell Booke, Godfrey Cambridge, Alan Alda, Beah Richards

One of the most significant Black films of the early 1960s was also one of the biggest financial failures. Based on the hit play Purlie Victorius written by Ossie Davis, the 1963 film Gone Are the Days was an eagerly anticipated film with high hopes for its success. Davis wrote the screenplay and stars as Reverend Purlie Victorious Judson, a fast-talking reverend who returns to the backwoods of Cotchipee County in rural Georgia, and the cotton plantation he fled when he was much younger. The plantation is owned by Ol’ Cap’n Stonewall Jackson Cotchipee (Sorrell Booke), an old-school southerner who misses the days of slavery and laments the recent Supreme Court decision regarding segregation.

Ol’ Cap’n Cotchipee keeps the sharecroppers on his plantation in check through fear and intimidation, and it was after a beating by him that Purlie ran away years earlier. Returning home after twenty years, Purlie has a plan to get even with Cotchipee. With help from the love of his life, Lutiebelle Gussie Mae Jenkins (Ruby Dee), the preacher plans to con the plantation owner out of $500, which Purlie will use to start a church. Things go wrong, and Purlie finds himself on the run once again, but when Ol’ Cap’n makes in appropriate overtures toward Lutiebelle, the preacher goes into a murderous rage, and sets out to confront the man that has oppressed him and his family for decades.

Co-starring Davis’s wife Ruby Dee, comedian Godfrey Cambridge, stage veteran Beah Richards, and co-produced by Brock Peters, Gone Are the Days was a dark satirical attack on the contemporary southern United States that was violently opposed to desegregation. Unfortunately, the broad comedy that had played well on the stage was lost on liberal White film audiences that mistook the comedic deconstruction of old stereotypes as actual stereotypes, and southern audiences refused to even see the movie. Complicating matters were the drastic changes that had occurred in the Civil Rights Movement in the time between the Broadway debut of Purlie Victorius in 1961 and the release of Gone Are the Days in 1963. Civil Rights leader Medgar Evers was murdered in his own driveway by a member of the Ku Klux Klan less than two months before the release of Gone Are the Days, which arrived in theatres a few weeks before the historic March on Washington, where Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.

Gone Are the Days was a financial failure, despite attempts to re-release the film under various other titles, including the ridiculous The Man from C.O.T.T.O.N., and the slightly longer, and even more ridiculous  Honeychile, It’s The Man from C.O.T.T.O.N. But despite the poor timing of the release and disastrous performance at the box office, the film works as a comedy. A brilliant comedy at that. Davis’s script is a wicked farce brimming with tongue-twisting poetic dialog and profound observations about racism and civil rights. And when you consider that the play and the film came along in the early 1960s, the script’s sharp poignancy becomes even more profound.

Davis, whose career had been filled with memorable performances, is at his best as both a writer and an actor, commanding the screen. But he is not alone. Ruby Dee is hilarious as his awe-struck love, and Alan Alda, in one of his first roles, gives a great performance as Charlie, the progressive thinking son of Ol’ Cap’n Cotchipee. If there is anyone who steals the film, however, it is Sorrell Booke as Cotchipee. Probably best known for his work on the television show Dukes of Hazard, where he co-starred as Boss Hog, Booke is amazing as the hopelessly racist plantation owner that would rather die than see the world around him change. Booke’s scenes with Godfrey Cambridge, co-starring as Purlie’s brother Gitlow, are comic perfection.

Filmed on a low budget with fake sets that resemble those of a stage production, some people might be initially put off by Gone Are the Days. From a technical standpoint the film can be a bit crude. Filmed by director Nicolas Webster as if it were a play, with long single takes and few edits (and many of the edits are a bit awkward), the movie relies on the performances of the actors to create comedic timing. And while the performances are all fine-tuned works of comedy, the entire cast brings the large, over-the-top energy of a stage-bound farce to the screen. In an era of sit-com derived humor and toilet jokes, the intelligent, screwball nature of Gone Are the Days may seem a bit outdated and foreign to contemporary audiences. But this is what a great comedy is and should be.

BAMF Classic Film Reviews – The Films of Matt Cimber, Part 2 (LADY COCOA; CANDY TANGERINE MAN)

LADY COCOA (a.k.a. POP GOES THE WEASEL) 1975, starring Lola Falana, Gene Washington, Mean Joe Greene

Speaking of films that never stop trying to entertain, while simultaneously failing to exhibit a true understanding of cinematic craft, Matt Cimber’s LADY COCOA (a.k.a. POP GOES THE WEASEL) is something akin to the little-exploitation-movie-that-could. That’s to say that the film seems to be mumbling to itself, “I think I can be exploitative, I think I can be exploitative,” over and over again, while never fully committing to the kind of sleaze one hopes for when watching grindhouse schlock. It’s a movie that’s too polite to offend you with gratuitous sex or violence, so it just relies on general filmmaking ineptitude to alienate the audience.

Lola Falana stars as Cocoa, who has been in a Nevada prison for refusing to testify against her mobster boyfriend. After more than a year in the joint, Cocoa’s tired of doing hard time, and decides to testify in exchange for her freedom…or at least that’s what she says. Unfortunately, it would seem Cocoa’s boyfriend is worried that she really will spill the beans, so he sends some muscle to kill her at the hotel where she is being held while awaiting trial. Meanwhile, some sparks are starting to fly between Cocoa and Doug (Gene Washington), one of the cops protecting her, maining there will be some kind inevitable showdown that may be exciting, or maybe boring as hell.

LADY COCOA was actually Matt Cimber’s third blaxploitation film, and while it isn’t nearly as good as the not-that-good-but-not-totally-terrible BLACK SIX, it is not without its charms – specifically Lola Falana, who is just plain fun to watch. Now, I’m not saying she’s “all that and a bag of chips,” but when you stack her up against actresses like Philomena Nowlan (MISS MELODY JONES) or Johnnie Hill (VELVET SMOOTH), you realize you’re looking at an Oscar caliber performance by comparison. Even though Falana does start to get a bit annoying with her whining, she’s pretty much the only person involved in the movie that seems to know what they’re doing. Even Matt Cimber is uncertain of what he’s doing, so much so that he remade LADY COCOA as FAKE OUT in 1982, with Pia Zadora replacing Lola Falana (because apparently Cimber likes actresses whose first and last names end with the letter ‘A.’

THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN 1975, starring: John Daniels, “the actual hookers and blades of Sunset Strip in Hollywood”

Even if director Matt Cimber had only made THE BLACK SIX and. POP GOES THE WEASEL, he would’ve earned a special place in the hearts of the most diehard blaxploitation fans; because while neither film is especially good, both refuse to be absolutely terrible in a way that defines so many other blaxploitation flicks. But it is not THE BLACK SIX or LADY COCOA that has earned Cimber a special place in the Schlock Cinema Hall of Fame, for neither of those films have the unbridled audacity or pure bravado of THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN, a movie that puts the “exploit” in exploitation. A tale of dual identities and one black man’s struggle to find financial success in world plagued by systemic racism and limited opportunities, THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN is a pimp movie unlike any other pimp movie ever made. John Daniels stars as Ron Lewis, a loving husband and father in the suburbs. But at night, Ron Lewis transforms into The Baron, a cold-blooded pimp runnin’ ho’s and puttin’ foot to ass on L.A.’s Sunset Strip. Between battling the Mafia, keeping the women in his stable in line, dealing with corrupt cops, and making sure his family believes he’s a traveling salesman on the road five days out of the week, The Baron has his hands full. In one night alone, The Baron pleasures one of his women, pulls another into his stable, and lays waste to five fools who try to come between him and his game, before returning to his unsuspecting wife, who wants him to fix a busted window in the bathroom. It’s a tough life, and as Big Daddy Kane once said, “Pimpin’ ain’t easy.” Lucky for The Baron he’s got a strong pimphand—not to mention his pimpmobile, outfitted with machine guns hidden behind the headlights. In fact he’s more than a pimp, he’s the Candy Tangerine Man—a super pimp, with pimpabilities far beyond those of mortal pimps.

By the time this film was released in 1975, the blaxploitation cycle had pretty much been played out. A political backlash that began in 1972 surrounding the film SUPER FLY charged that most of the films being produced for black audiences focused on morally suspect characters, and glorified black criminality. Organizations like NAACP and CORE took issue with movies like SUPER FLY and THE MACK, but the vast majority of all blaxploitation films were pretty tame when held up next to THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN. If, in fact, any of the movies produced during the blaxploitation era were worthy of harsh criticism for being morally corrupt, and pandering to the exploitative elements of sex and violence, it is this film. If there was ever a film that could be described as depraved grindhouse swill—in the most positive of contexts, mind you—it would have to be THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN. The film contains everything from golden showers to rape to mutilation (one hooker gets her breasts cut off, and a mob enforcer loses a hand in a garbage disposal). And of course there is the cast of extras, which, according to the credits, features “the actual hookers and blades of Sunset Strip in Hollywood,” all of whom lend an air of authenticity to the movie, while also being some of the most unattractive people captured on film.

John Daniels gives what is arguably the finest performance of his career as Ron Lewis/The Baron. Daniels is best known by blaxploitation fans for this film, and director Greydon Clark’s mind-melting sleazefest BLACK SHAMPOO. Daniels also appeared in such films as HIT MAN (the blaxploitation remake of GET CARTER), BARE KNUCKLES, and GETTING OVER (which he co-wrote and co-produced). Outside of film, Daniels was a successful businessman, magazine publisher, song writer, nightclub owner, and manager of the all-women singing group The Love Machine. His Los Angeles nightclub, Maverick’s Flat, is a place of legend, having played host to some of the greatest R&B and funk acts of all time. Acting was never Daniels’s greatest passion, which is fortunate, since he has a rather limited range. But his limited skills as an actor are not so much a reflection of whatever talent he may or may not have possessed, but rather an indictment on the work of director Matt Cimber.

Having already established that the crafting of fine cinematic fare was not his strong point, Cimber sticks to what he does best with THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN. And what he does best is craft low budget exploitation flicks meant to offer momentary distraction from the outside world. In the smoke-filled grindhouse theaters, and at the drive-in theaters that showed movies like THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN sandwiched in with other movies as part of double and triple features, the standards of determining good from bad are always in flux. THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN is one of those films that walk the fine line between sleazy and charming, and to be perfectly honest, it takes a special person to appreciate that fine line. That’s not to say that the film is not worth watching, or even enjoying with a sort of sadistic, depraved pleasure, because if that’s your cup of tea, then this cup runneth over. By the stick used to measure movies of this nature, THE CANDY TANGERINE MAN is a good film. Of course, “good” is a purely subjective standard that must be applied accordingly.